By G. C. Peden
This booklet integrates technique, expertise and economics and offers a brand new method of taking a look at twentieth-century army background and Britain's decline as an exceptional strength. G. C. Peden explores how from the Edwardian period to the Sixties war was once remodeled through a chain of recommendations, together with dreadnoughts, submarines, plane, tanks, radar, nuclear guns and guided missiles. He indicates that the price of those new guns tended to upward thrust extra fast than nationwide source of revenue and argues that procedure needed to be tailored to take account of either the elevated efficiency of recent guns and the economy's diminishing skill to maintain defense force of a given measurement. ahead of the advance of nuclear guns, British approach was once in response to a capability to wear out an enemy via blockade, attrition (in the 1st global battle) and strategic bombing (in the Second), and hence energy rested as a lot on financial energy as on armaments.
Read Online or Download Arms, Economics and British Strategy: From Dreadnoughts to Hydrogen Bombs (Cambridge Military Histories) PDF
Similar military sciences books
This study assortment presents a entire research of significant strategic, cultural, moral and philosophical points of recent struggle. It bargains a fresh research of key concerns in sleek struggle, not just by way of the behavior of warfare and the broader complexities and ramifications of recent clash, but in addition options of conflict, the the most important shifts within the constitution of war, and the morality and legality of using strength in a post-9/11 age.
Even though the military-industrial complicated grew to become well-known to such a lot americans in the course of the chilly conflict, Paul Koistinen exhibits that its origins really return to the sunrise of this century. Mobilizing for contemporary warfare, the second one of a unprecedented five-volume examine at the political economic climate of yankee battle, highlights the emergence of this pivotal dating.
- Understanding Global Security
- Social Sciences and the Military: An Interdisciplinary Overview (Cass Military Studies)
- Global Threat: Target-Centered Assessment and Management (Praeger Security International)
- Living and Surviving in Harm's Way: A Psychological Treatment Handbook for Pre- and Post-Deployment of Military Personnel
- Implications of Modern Decision Science for Military Decision-Support Systems
Additional info for Arms, Economics and British Strategy: From Dreadnoughts to Hydrogen Bombs (Cambridge Military Histories)
The advantages of volunteers, who served for longer periods than conscripts could have been required to do, were more time for training and for service in the Empire. On the other hand, volunteers had to be paid more than conscripts and were fewer in number, so consequently the army had no large reserves for an extended campaign. Roberts resigned from the CID in November 1905 to become president of the National Service League, which agitated for some form of compulsory service for home defence (thereby releasing the Regular Army for service overseas).
In 1912 an Admiralty committee on the design of future submarines recommended that there should be two types: economy-sized ones suitable for coastal defence, and a new, larger type with range and surface speed that would enable it to operate with the fleet. The concept of the fleet submarine 21 Jon Tetsuro Sumida, In Defence of Naval Supremacy: Finance, Technology and British Naval Policy (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 71–100, 331–7. 22 One weapon that the Royal Navy did not develop to the same extent as other navies was the mine, despite the sinking of three battleships that struck mines during the Russo-Japanese War.
Naval history has long focused on battleships, which were used as the principal yardstick in contemporary debates on naval strength. However, Nicholas Lambert has identified the torpedo and the submarine as the most dynamic technical forces for change, allied to financial stringency which forced Fisher to look for economical solutions to strategic and tactical problems. Fisher developed a theory of flotilla defence in coastal waters by submarines and surface craft armed with long-range torpedoes, while large armoured vessels, which came to be called battle-cruisers, would control the Empire’s trade routes and communications.